ClimatePatrol.com
Menu
Site Home
Forums [ Recent Posts ]
Chat
Photo Gallery
News
News Archives
Satellite Images
Weather Maps

Google Links
 

News
New Scientist - Climate Change
Science Daily
National Hurricane Center - Atlantic Basin Updates
National Hurricane Center - Pacific Basin Updates
USGS - Recent Quakes Mag 2.5 or Greater
NOAA News
AccuWeather News
FEMA - News & Disasters
NASA - News
National Geographic - News
Volcano Live - John Seach
Climate Ark
Yahoo Hurricane News
Christian Geology News
Topix.net - Tornado News
[ List All News Sources ]
Important Information
Search the forums Search   Frequently Asked Questions FAQ   View member list Member List   Recent Posts Recent Posts   Forum Stats Stats Back to: ClimatePatrol.com
[ Printable Version ]
Author: Subject: Abrupt Climate Change Scenario --- from the Pentagon report - 2004
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/23/2007 at 09:21
Abrupt Climate Change Scenario --- from the Pentagon report - 2004


some key points ...

Quote From Source:

Because changes have been gradual so far, and are projected to be similarly gradual in the future, the effects of global warming have the potential to be manageable for most nations. Recent research, however, suggests that there is a
possibility that this gradual global warming could lead to a relatively abrupt slowing of the ocean's thermohaline conveyor, which could lead to harsher winter weather conditions, sharply reduced soil moisture, and more intense winds in certain regions that currently provide a significant fraction of the world's food production. With inadequate preparation, the result could be a significant drop in the human carrying capacity of the Earth's environment.

Paleoclimatic evidence suggests that altered climatic patterns could last for as much as a century, as they did when the ocean conveyor collapsed 8,200 years ago, or, at the extreme, could last as long as 1,000 years as they did during the
Younger Dryas, which began about 12,700 years ago.
In this report, as an alternative to the scenarios of gradual climatic warming that are so common, we outline an abrupt climate change scenario patterned after the 100- year event that occurred about 8,200 years ago. This abrupt change scenario is characterized by the following conditions:

· Annual average temperatures drop by up to 5 degrees Fahrenheit over Asia and North America and 6 degrees Fahrenheit in northern Europe
· Annual average temperatures increase by up to 4 degrees Fahrenheit in key areas throughout Australia, South America, and southern Africa.
· Drought persists for most of the decade in critical agricultural regions and in the water resource regions for major population centers in Europe and eastern North America.
· Winter storms and winds intensify, amplifying the impacts of the changes.
Western Europe and the North Pacific experience enhanced winds.

There are some indications today that global warming has reached the threshold where the thermohaline circulation could start to be significantly impacted. These indications include observations documenting that the North Atlantic is increasingly
being freshened by melting glaciers, increased precipitation, and fresh water runoff making it substantially less salty over the past 40 years.

This report suggests that, because of the potentially dire consequences, the risk of abrupt climate change, although uncertain and quite possibly small, should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a U.S. national security concern. ...

Click source url to view entire story.



these are just a few of the points from the Pentagon report.
they chose the shorter time of ~ 100 years, in all honestly,
our 21st century society will not survive the ~ 1000 year freeze,
and I'm not 100% certain of the 100 year model.

I have the pdf if anyone would like it, also I've extracted the
text to a .doc file.

Remember - this report was issued three years ago.

peace,
DanG

View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/23/2007 at 09:40



DanG has attached this image:
59/uncertain future ahead_798.jpg - 14.9kb
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4190
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 80690

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 7/23/2007 at 17:23

That document exists somewhere on this site lol. I just don't remember where. :scratchhead:



"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
FatalWishes
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5585
Registered: 6/24/2004
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Member Is Offline
Points: 104296

Mood: Aging Cynic

[*] posted on 7/23/2007 at 22:14

Yeah remember reading it because we were making fun of how they shortened to 35 years from 100. Seems like its going on today...maybe they meant 35 days :D



They should take the warning labels off of everything and let stupidity sort itself out.

Please check out our new website at www.globalwarmingisnotreal.com
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserFatalWishes's Yahoo
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/30/2007 at 11:36

repeat after me --

Greenland Glaciers

Greenland Glaciers
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/30/2007 at 11:49

more info ... from dot gov
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs2-00/
Estimated potential maximum sea-level rise from the total melting of present-day glaciers.

DanG has attached this image:
84/tbl1_387.gif - 4.29kb
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/30/2007 at 11:50

same source
Red shows areas along the Gulf Coast and East Coast of the United States that would be flooded by a 10-meter rise in sea level. Population figures for 1996 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, unpublished data, 1998) indicate that a 10-meter rise in sea level would flood approximately 25 percent of the Nation's population.

DanG has attached this image:
73/fig3_458.jpg - 10.69kb
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/30/2007 at 11:54

The Greenland melt is doubly important
if it happens slowly, it will cause a fault or stall(!) of the Atlantic Current.
if it happens quickly, it could (by itself!) cause a sea level rise of over 20 FT.
and of course a sudden slide into the sea would cause a world-wide tsunami...


DanG has attached this image:
4a/colddevil_595.jpg - 657b
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4190
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 80690

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 7/30/2007 at 20:01

The numbers are for a TOTAL melt which will never happen. I doubt we even come close. Just my opinion though. We'll never live long enough to know. I doubt our children live long enough to know either. Or even their children.



"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/30/2007 at 20:42

I sir do not have such a rosey view.
and in a relativly short time we'll have a better idea.

:baddevil:
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
Avastar
Member
*




Posts: 236
Registered: 5/28/2007
Location: San Francisco
Member Is Offline
Points: 9305


[*] posted on 7/31/2007 at 23:02

I do like the number 2012 ... just something nice and comforting about it ...

Five years at the current rate of change ... ;) ... I'd bet Mom has a milestone year.
View User's ProfileView All Posts By User
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5520
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 114991

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 7/31/2007 at 23:27

Quoting Avastar - posted on 7/31/2007 at 23:02

I do like the number 2012 ... just something nice and comforting about it ...

Five years at the current rate of change ... ;) ... I'd bet Mom has a milestone year.




:bouncing:
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo

User Info
Welcome Guest!



Site Stats
Registered Users: 154
Topics: 4125
Posts: 20997
News Stories: 154715
Satellite Images: 1370768


Last 10 Active Threads
PNG region
Russia to cut off Ukraine's gas on Thursday
Earthquake Swarm - Yellowstone Lake!
Need your help with quotes
21 Days And Counting Without Sunspots
'It's going to be much worse' (Economy)
December 2008 Deep In Solar Minimum
Heavy Snow/Freezing Rain/Blizzard for Portland Area This Weekend
Northwest Passage Opens Early - 2007 record may be broken
how bout a 2012 party ?




XMB Modified By ClimatePatrol.com Team. Original By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
ClimateBoard v2.0 © 2004-2008 ClimatePatrol.com