ClimatePatrol.com
Menu
Site Home
Forums [ Recent Posts ]
Chat
Photo Gallery
News
News Archives
Weather Maps

Google Links
 

News
New Scientist - Climate Change
Science Daily
National Hurricane Center - Atlantic Basin Updates
National Hurricane Center - Pacific Basin Updates
USGS - Recent Quakes Mag 2.5 or Greater
NOAA News
AccuWeather News
FEMA - News & Disasters
NASA - News
National Geographic - News
Volcano Live - John Seach
Climate Ark
Yahoo Hurricane News
Christian Geology News
Topix.net - Tornado News
[ List All News Sources ]
Important Information
Search the forums Search   Frequently Asked Questions FAQ   View member list Member List   Recent Posts Recent Posts   Forum Stats Stats Back to: ClimatePatrol.com
[ Printable Version ]
Author: Subject: Washington Times Exposes AP Bias In Climategate Reporting
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4746
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 92745

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 1/5/2010 at 09:24
Washington Times Exposes AP Bias In Climategate Reporting


Way to go Washington Times for busting the AP on this dishonest bit of work to protect those involved in Climategate. Mad props. You guys really need to read this story in full.

Quote From Source:

That's not happening. To judge by recent coverage from Associated Press, the Fourth Estate watchdog has acted like a third-rate pocket pet. Case in point is an 1,800-word AP missive that appeared in hundreds of publications, many carrying it on the front page of their Sunday, Dec. 13 issue with the headline, "Science not faked, but not pretty." AP gave three scientists copies of the controversial e-mails and then asked them about their conclusions. The wire service portrayed the trio of scientists as dismissing or minimizing allegations of scientific fraud when, in fact, the scientists believe no such thing.

Click source url to view entire story.



http://www.washingtontimes.c...ate/?feat=article_top10_read

So does this make the AP an accomplice? Or are they just guilty of shoddy reporting? I really expected more from them. But what do you do when you've blindly run one global warming story after another without apparently checking your work? You have to defend your source of information. This is like Dan Rather and the stupid Bush memo that he ran with. Same thing but on a much larger scale. There are reputations at stake and many are getting ruined.




"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 7046
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 145896

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 1/5/2010 at 09:41


busted !
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
shakespear
Beginner





Posts: 16
Registered: 11/29/2009
Member Is Offline
Points: 160


[*] posted on 1/5/2010 at 10:00

:) :) :)

Quote:
The Washington Times was founded in 1982 by Unification Church leader Sun Myung Moon[1], who has said that he is the Messiah and the Second Coming of Christ and is fulfilling Jesus' unfinished mission.[2][3] Bo Hi Pak, Moon's chief aide, was the founding president and the founding chairman of the board.[4] In 1996 Moon discussed his reasons for founding the Times in an address to a Unification Church leadership conference, saying "That is why Father has been combining and organizing scholars from all over the world, and also newspaper organizations, in order to make propaganda."[5] In 2002 Moon said: "The Washington Times is responsible to let the American people know about God" and "The Washington Times will become the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world."[6]



:alien8: :alien8:

I am not a climate expert. However I was aware of this one fact about this paper.

It would be sort of like finding out that capitalism is corrupt from Soviet "Pravda" newspaper. Without an impartial expert opinion (how do you get it today I have no clue) I do not buy their story.
;)
View User's ProfileView All Posts By User
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4746
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 92745

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 1/5/2010 at 10:03

Doesn't matter who the messenger is. It only matters whether the story is true or not.



"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
shakespear
Beginner





Posts: 16
Registered: 11/29/2009
Member Is Offline
Points: 160


[*] posted on 1/5/2010 at 10:34

;) ;)

In a perfect World I would go with that one, however it is not perfect.

So "I" chose to use the litmus test that "the messenger" does matter. :)
View User's ProfileView All Posts By User
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4746
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 92745

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 1/5/2010 at 13:37

So we can assume that anything that comes from the IPCC and Hansen is total nonsense right?



"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User

User Info
Welcome Guest!



Site Stats
Registered Users: 203
Topics: 4624
Posts: 26376
News Stories: 263725


Last 10 Active Threads
Tropical Storm Gaston
New Zealand Region
Long-dormant volcano erupts in Indonesia
Hurricane Earl
ANOTHER Oil Platform Explosion in the Gulf
IPCCC Lies I tell you ...LIES
Mobile phones responsible for disappearance of honey bee
Hurricane Danielle forms in the Atlantic
Tropical Storm Fiona
Cold Weather Coming - Brrrrr




XMB Modified By ClimatePatrol.com Team. Original By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
ClimateBoard v2.0 © 2004-2008 ClimatePatrol.com