ClimatePatrol.com
Menu
Site Home
Forums [ Recent Posts ]
Chat
Photo Gallery
News
News Archives
Satellite Images
Weather Maps

Google Links
 

News
New Scientist - Climate Change
Science Daily
National Hurricane Center - Atlantic Basin Updates
National Hurricane Center - Pacific Basin Updates
USGS - Recent Quakes Mag 2.5 or Greater
NOAA News
AccuWeather News
FEMA - News & Disasters
NASA - News
National Geographic - News
Volcano Live - John Seach
Climate Ark
Yahoo Hurricane News
Christian Geology News
Topix.net - Tornado News
[ List All News Sources ]
Important Information
Search the forums Search   Frequently Asked Questions FAQ   View member list Member List   Recent Posts Recent Posts   Forum Stats Stats Back to: ClimatePatrol.com
[ Printable Version ]
Author: Subject: 75-mph car runs on AA batteries
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5424
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 113506

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 12/18/2007 at 18:48
75-mph car runs on AA batteries


Quote From Source:
A vehicle powered by 192 AA dry-cell batteries hit a top speed of 122.00 kilometers per hour (75.81 mph) during time trials in Japan Saturday. The carbon fiber reinforced plastic car averaged 105.95 kph (65.83 mph). The average speed is said to be the fastest achieved by a dry cell-powered vehicle, and a Guinness Book of World Records adjudicator present at the test run said he would report the achievement to his head office for formal recognition. The 84-pound vehicle is 10.8 feet long, 2.6 feet wide, and just 1.8 feet tall, and is manufactured by students at Osaka Sangyo University with the help of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.

Click source url to view entire story.


http://www.greentechforum.ne...ph-car-runs-on-aa-batteries/

DanG has attached this image:
f0/it keeps going_404.jpg - 20.99kb
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
chrisisasavage
Elite Member
**


Avatar


Posts: 1067
Registered: 7/10/2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
Points: 21770

Mood: Mostly harmless

[*] posted on 12/18/2007 at 18:52

84 lbs, good luck with that if an SUV nails you.
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
chrisisasavage
Elite Member
**


Avatar


Posts: 1067
Registered: 7/10/2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
Points: 21770

Mood: Mostly harmless

[*] posted on 12/18/2007 at 18:53

Amazing though
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
MountainManMike
Elite Member
**




Posts: 928
Registered: 11/7/2007
Location: Durango, CO
Member Is Offline
Points: 15620

Mood: always tired

[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 03:33

my thoughts exactly, they never make these cars very safe...good luck if a geo metro hits u...
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4119
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 79455

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 05:08

My battery charger holds 4 AA batteries at a time. Dang.. I think my first set would be old and dated by the time I got the last set charged lol.



"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
FatalWishes
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5515
Registered: 6/24/2004
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Member Is Offline
Points: 102081

Mood: Aging Cynic

[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 08:06

Tires would be dry rotted by the time it was charged up enough to drive again.

You would lose a head on collision with a dog as well. The good thing is motors are becoming more efficient and all we really need is a good, super fast long lasting rechargeable battery.




They should take the warning labels off of everything and let stupidity sort itself out.

Please check out our new website at www.globalwarmingisnotreal.com
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserFatalWishes's Yahoo
DanG
Administrator
********


Avatar


Posts: 5424
Registered: 6/30/2004
Location: SW FL
Member Is Offline
Points: 113506

Mood: Stunned Amazement

[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 09:30

c'mon guys - its a test machine, a proof of concept. it'll never hit the road.
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By UserDanG's Yahoo
chrisisasavage
Elite Member
**


Avatar


Posts: 1067
Registered: 7/10/2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
Points: 21770

Mood: Mostly harmless

[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 12:12

lol, I realize it. I do like to see the electric vehicles improving. They have concept cars that can go 75 off of AA's, and concept cars that can get the equivalent to 6000 mpg. You wouldn't drive one on the road, but the technology is clearly improving. Give us a viable energy source (fuel cells?) and give us sturdy vehicles, and we might have something!
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
Indy
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 4119
Registered: 6/24/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 79455

Mood: Resident Skeptic

[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 18:38

Fuel cells could be the way to go. If you are thinking of them as a method of storing power generated by an outside source. It is like the electrified rail lines that dominate Europe. The great thing about that is that it doesn't matter what you use to power the line. You can use coal, hydro, nuke, etc. Doesn't matter. Just plug in the power to the system and the trains go. So if a newer and better way comes up for generating the power you just plug that in and everything runs just as before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel every time a new way of generating power is discovered.



"I think God gives us children so death won't come as such a disappointment." - Two and a Half Men
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User
Jeffers
Member
*


Avatar


Posts: 254
Registered: 10/29/2004
Member Is Offline
Points: 4455


[*] posted on 12/19/2007 at 21:10

Would this car carry my booze from the monthly Costco runs?

I think fuel cells are the only way to go for transportation but they are a good way away from being ready. I've seen estimates of between 10 and 40 years.
View User's ProfileView All Posts By User
chrisisasavage
Elite Member
**


Avatar


Posts: 1067
Registered: 7/10/2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Member Is Offline
Points: 21770

Mood: Mostly harmless

[*] posted on 12/20/2007 at 10:45

Quoting Indy - posted on 12/19/2007 at 18:38

Fuel cells could be the way to go. If you are thinking of them as a method of storing power generated by an outside source. It is like the electrified rail lines that dominate Europe. The great thing about that is that it doesn't matter what you use to power the line. You can use coal, hydro, nuke, etc. Doesn't matter. Just plug in the power to the system and the trains go. So if a newer and better way comes up for generating the power you just plug that in and everything runs just as before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel every time a new way of generating power is discovered.




Exactly, this is how we could diversify w/o putting in an unrealistic and complex infrastructure. The diversity is in how the power is generated, not how it's transfered to the vehicles.
View User's ProfileVisit User's HomepageView All Posts By User

User Info
Welcome Guest!



Site Stats
Registered Users: 150
Topics: 4078
Posts: 20638
News Stories: 147565
Satellite Images: 1102653


Last 10 Active Threads
Northwest Passage Opens Early - 2007 record may be broken
Magnetic Portals Connect Sun and Earth
'It's going to be much worse' (Economy)
Peak Oil Tracker
GM - Live or Die
Cheney, Gonzales indicted
Central America Region
Even as winds calm, more Californians flee fires
Indonesia Region
Deja Vu All Over Again: Blogger Again Finds Error in NASA Climate Data




XMB Modified By ClimatePatrol.com Team. Original By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
ClimateBoard v2.0 © 2004-2008 ClimatePatrol.com