|
| ClimatePatrol.com News and Information |
Washington Times Exposes AP Climategate Bias
Posted 01-05-10 08:29:40am by Indy
In a must read story the Washington Times exposes an AP bias in regards to Climategate. Is this a case of bad journalism or is this an attempt to protect reputations? I can't help but think of Dan Rather and the silly Bush memo that resulted in Rather leaving CBS. For years the AP and other news organizations have blindly printed every bit of global warming tripe that crossed the news wire. Now it appears the news source has turned sour on them. This is like CBS not doing their homework when it came to their source. Who was checking the information? Who was double checking it? Who was making sure any of this really made sense? Who checked both sides of the story? It seems as if nobody did. And now it has come back to haunt them. Instead of doing the right thing and really exposing the dishonesty behind this they try and smooth things over. They try and protect their source of bad information instead of parting ways with the source.
Climategate Bias Exposed
Facts Prove Global Warming A Myth
Posted 07-21-09 02:22:52am by Indy
Have you ever wondered whether it were possible Global Warming were a myth? What if you were shown that most of the warming we were told happened since 1950 was nothing more than adjustments made to raw surface data collected? It is true. According to NOAA's own work they have slowly padded raw surface observations to the point that they are adding half a degree F to the collected data. How much have you heard the globe has warmed in the last 50 years? I'd be willing to bet it isn't too far from half a degree F.
Read the latest on this and see how NOAA has also doctored sea surface temperature observations because of some unfriendly cold bias that didn't fit their agenda.
Global Warming Exposed
Deep Solar Minimum Continues
Posted 07-01-09 10:38:53am by Indy
July has arrived and half of the year 2009 is now in the record books. On the surface June seemed to have so much promise but it is clear that we are still very deep in this extended solar minimum.
If you are like me and keep an eye on the sunspot activity daily you were probably thinking things were finally turning a corner. Perhaps they are but June wasn't it. I thought a few solar disturbances lacking a true spot were being called a spot during the month. Now that the official sunspot number for June has been released that appears to be the case. At the end of the day on the 30th I had seen the unofficial sunspot number listed at 6.6. The official number was significantly lower at 2.6.
View Full Story
Visit Us On Facebook!
Posted 06-28-09 07:03:52pm by Indy
I have created a new group on Facebook to help us spread the word about the realities of climate change. Some are quick to blame man for everything. They speak of a mythical consensus. Lets unravel that myth.
Our Facebook Group.
If you have any doubts just keep in mind the previous consensus from some 20 years ago that stated man was responsible for the ozone hole. After expensive rules changes the hole was the 2nd largest on record in 2008. All those changes and it made absolutely no difference.
|
|
|
| Site Stats |
Registered Users: 192
Topics: 4499
Posts: 24948
News Stories: 227713
|
|
